The Atheist agenda is destroying our understanding of evolution.
The truth is far more exciting.
Modern Atheism (with a capital “A”) wants you to believe evolution is random, chaotic, accidental.
According to Atheists, we’re all Read more »
Blog
I have plenty of atheists friends whom I get along with just fine.
If you look at all the scientific data out there…
- What we know about genetics…
- What we know about the origin of life…
- All we know about the birth of the universe…
- How life changes and evolves…
- Where humans came from, and why we think and feel like we do…
If you take a look at all of that — and all the big questions it raises — it infers a tremendous amount of majesty and precision in the universe. But if you decide there’s no God behind it all, I won’t jump down your throat.
Anybody who’s developed a modicum of chops with Google ads knows how utterly Darwinian Google is. Most of your ads 
vanish forever after being seen by (maybe) a few thousand eyeballs.
1% of the advertisers get 50% of the traffic. Everyone else fights over the scraps. And every ounce of your AdWords education costs you money.
As an advertiser, you know Read more »
An Amazon reader named Gordon loves Evolution 2.0, but asks: Read more »
Newsweek article “The Secrets of the Human Cell” explains:
“Each of those 100 trillion cells functions like a walled city. Power plants generate the cell’s energy.
Factories produce proteins, vital units of chemical commerce.
Complex transportation systems guide specific chemicals from point to point within the cell and beyond.
The legendary atheist and evolutionary theorist Richard Dawkins appeared on WBUR, Boston’s 
National Public Radio affiliate. He was debating Design advocate George Gilder.
Dawkins was a professor at Oxford University. One of his admirers had created a special endowment for him, The Charles Simyoni Chair for the Public Understanding of Science.
Minutes before the show began, Dawkins announced that he wasn’t going to debate Gilder, but insisted that Gilder talk for the first 15 minutes, then Dawkins would talk for the final 15 minutes.
I thought that was… shall we say, odd.
Anyway, a caller asked Dawkins about the Origin of Life. Dawkins replied that it was “a happy chemical accident.”
A happy chemical accident?
What do you think of that answer?
–
Recently an Evolution 2.0 reader reached out. He’d done deep study of the linguistics of DNA.
Because I’d 
mentioned designing speakers and stereo equipment in chapter 3 of my book, he sent a photo of a some speakers he’d built.
He had no idea I also built a system that was spooky similar. Same design idea. Same ribbon drivers from the same boutique German manufacturer.
I sent him back some pictures. We both got a chuckle from this “needles in haystacks” meeting in such an unlikely context. Read more »
A Biblical Evolution Model
Is Evolution Compatible With The Bible?
Can you be a Christian and believe in evolution?
Some say: “If God chose to create us via evolution, I’m fine with that.”
Others see evolution as a threat… with grave theological difficulties: The nature of man, original sin, the necessity of Christ. Some insist evolution undercuts Read more »
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Subscribe: RSS
God, Science and the Universe: A Dialogue at the University of Toronto on Saturday, March 19, 7-9pm EDT.
Three big thinkers, well-known in their various fields, will be together for the first time on the stage at the University of Toronto’s Convocation Hall discussing God, science and the universe: Read more »
Today I searched Google News for “evolution of” to see how the phrase gets used. Titles of headlines included:
