Recent Comments

• What's the matter with miracles in science?
  • Johan Nel { Martin, Just a vey short summary of my views: The cell : The most primitive simple cell to function needs ... }
  • Amal M { Hi Perry, I've read your Evolution 2.0 book and it was an eye opener for me and I was convinced ... }
  • martin rag { Dear Perry, as to yours: "when cancer cells are this smart, then what can healthy cells do?" I completely understand ... }
• Oxford Professor Denis Noble takes down “The Selfish Gene”
  • Amal Mohan { Hi Perry, I've read that Dennis Noble doesn't believe in genetic "codes" or any other programs/codes/ blueprints... could you please clarify ... }
  • Eli Smithson { “ This person’s statement that life is bottom-up, not top down, is something he needs to prove. Nobody gets to ... }
• Courage Fueled by Curiosity = Love
  • Marc Wong { Back in the day, my English teacher introduced us to Northrop Frye, who wrote in his book “The Secular Scripture” ... }
• Intellectual Cage Match: Perry Marshall vs. Mike Levin
  • Josh S { You can read his book The Master Builder: How the New Science of the Cell Is Rewriting the Story of ... }
  • Josh S { All the research I've read indicates that inheritance will always resolve at the unit of the genes. Also, could you ... }
  • Josh S { If Levin’s work is indeed correct, what are its implications to the current Modern Synthesis paradigm? }
• Science is Reconsidering Evolution
  • Josh S { Perry, have you noticed how the neo-Darwinists are claiming that the evolutionary mechanisms discussed in your book (horizontal gene transfer, ... }
• A Closer Look at Genesis 1
  • Pete Holzmann { Perry, This is quite interesting. Sarah Salviander (astrophysicist ) has her own quite detailed comparison of Genesis 1 and the science... ... }
• Bible and Science, Reconciled
  • Pete Holzmann { Perry, I encourage adding linkage to Sarah's work on her website. It's quite good 😉 ...Here's the page with this ... }
• Origin Of Life: What We Do and Do Not Know
  • Evgenii Rudnyi { I know some papers of Levin, thank you. By the way, by Peirce the creative step in logic was abduction. ... }
  • Evgenii Rudnyi { Perry, Thank you for the link. Have I understood correctly, that negentropy is creativity in cognition? I agree with you ... }
  • Evgenii Rudnyi { I believe that it would be better to remove disorder and order from the list. The problem is that there ... }
• When Dinosaur Books Are More Dangerous Than Playboy Magazine
  • Rob Black { Perry, Just thought I would mention: You were right! I just (finally) finished reading ...And It Was So. Very interesting ... }
• Young Earth Creation vs. Old Earth Creation
  • Robert Sullivan { Perry, I can’t adequately convey how appreciative I am of you taking the time to dialog with me on your ... }
  • Robert Sullivan { A followup thought to consider. Doesn’t your EV2.0 prize lend support to my proposal? In spite of some of the ... }
  • Robert Sullivan { Thanks so much for your response, Perry. To clarify my point, since 'code' is fundamental to life and the universe, ... }
• Isn't a Deist God a little less troublesome?
  • Mukesh Chauhan { Equality existed before Christ. We were all born equal...the entire worldly cycle is not fully understood by both religions and ... }
• The Biggest Mystery in the History of the Universe | Joana Xavier on the Origin of Life
  • martin rag { hey Perry, just to clarify: no, I am not YEC, it seems that Earth is way older than 6000 - ... }
  • martin rag { Dear Perry, >Joana is certainly interested in bioengineering of self replicating machines. Just because it hasn’t been done doesn’t mean ... }
  • martin rag { Dear Perry, once again, thank you for not censoring my comments. Also, thank you for your patience and understanding.. . I ... }
• Why computers are not conscious: Assigning Meaning
  • Josh Sharp { Perry, I read your blog, but I have to ask, do your sources provided at the end accept the genetic ... }
  • Josh Sharp { I can't take Sara Walker seriously anymore after she started promoting Assembly Theory with Cronin }
  • Josh Sharp { What I am understanding is that dogmatic neodarwinists do not want to accept the possibility of an intelligent agent behind ... }